One problem with being a long term WebObjects developer is that I get extremely jaded when viewing other technologies. WebObjects isn’t perfect, there’s lots of room for improvement, but for a very early (’95/’96) web application server, it is remarkably mature. It has a persistence layer, application server and template engine, as well as a set of enabling frameworks and IDE. I had to discover those terms before even starting to look around. Names that are dropped on the WebObjects mailing lists include Eclipse, Tomcat, TopDeck, Cayenne, Struts, Tapestry. I have also read about Hibernate and Spring. A number of these are parts of the Apache Jakarta project. It isn’t clear to me that there is actually a strong preference for any particular combination, although Eclipse as the IDE seems to win hands down.
Pages
Categories
Archives
Meta
Tags
amazon asterisk baking book review bread cocoa content management cookery design patterns diy dns dressage eclipse html iOS iOS iPhone iphone iPod/iPhone java javascript mac mini mail mysql pda programming prototype python rails riding rss ruby scriptaculous unit tests unix admin webobjects wifi xcode-
RSS Links
-
Post a Comment